Launched in May 2020, the Oppo Find X2 Neo is a new mid-range phone in the Find X2 series. It features a AMOLED with a fast 90 Hz refresh rate, a slim aluminum and Gorilla Glass build, and Qualcomm’s capable Snapdragon 765G chipset backed by 12 GB of system memory and 256 GB of UFS storage. The Oppo’s standard-wide camera has a 48 MP 1/ sensor with PDAF that bins down to MP output behind a 26 mm-equivalent f/ OIS lens. A 13 MP 1/ PDAF sensor with a 53 mm-equivalent f/ lens gives it a bit of reach, while a wide module with an 8 MP 1/ sensor and a mm-equivalent f/ lens kicks in when you want as much coverage as you can get. We tested the Find X2 Neo’s video at its maximum 4K resolution, at 30 frames per second. Lowering the resolution to 1080p allows for a faster frame rate of 60 fps if desired. Video benefits from optical stabilization if the lens in use supports it as well as from gyroscope-enabled electronic image stabilization gyro-EIS to keep shots steady. Read on to find out how the Oppo Find X2 Neo performed under the new version 4 of the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. Test summary Oppo Find X2 Neo 105 camera 68 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 94 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 93 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 92 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 62 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 54 Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 39 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 55 Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 44 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 81 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 31 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 65 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 81 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 79 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 80 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 77 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 81 Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Best Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 84 93 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 The Oppo Find X2 Neo is a mid-range smartphone whose DXOMARK Camera score of 105 indicates a camera performance that is adequate for its class but cannot rival high-end phones. The Photo score of 106 is based on an uneven imaging performance under our new testing protocol. Exposure is generally accurate, though in low-light conditions, the phone tends to underexpose and our testers noted variations in exposure for a given scene. In this lab scene, for example, the Oppo’s HDR algorithm kicked in on some occasions but not on others. Our testers also saw the focus fail on the same scene. Lab scene at 20 lux / 7 EV, HDR activation, good focus Lab scene at 20 lux / 7 EV, HDR not activated, focus failure Dynamic range is limited, and the Find X2 Neo struggles to capture high-contrast scenes without clipping highlights or shadows, especially under lower light conditions. Colors are vivid and generally pleasant, and the camera does a good job with skin tones in typical indoor lighting, though when light levels drop further, skin tones and overall color quality suffers. Accurate target exposure and pleasant color outdoors Capturing detail is a stronger point for the Find X2 Neo, with good texture outdoors and in bright conditions. Indoors, fine detail is lost, and detail drops noticeably in low-light conditions, partly because of underexposure. Noise levels, on the other hand, are higher than with the great majority of phones we’ve tested under our new protocol. Noise is visible in most situations, even in bright outdoor shooting especially in blue skies. Slight underexposure in low light with loss of detail In our night testing, exposure was too low in dark scenes that couldn’t be lit with flash such as cityscapes, though the phone did better in our flash-auto portrait shot, with accurate exposure and good detail. Autofocus is fairly slow under bright outdoor conditions and in high-contrast situations across light levels, with less consistency than is ideal. In portrait mode, the Find X2 Neo does a good job of separating the subject from the background and applying a believable blur effect, though it fails to apply foreground blur to the shrub in the example below. It renders the model’s face naturally, with good detail and color, something that not all portrait modes manage to do. However, highlights in the background are not rendered properly, the bokeh effect is somewhat inconsistent, and the phone struggles in low-light conditions. Flash-auto night portrait, accurate target exposure, good detail Portrait mode, good separation but no blur on foreground shrub The Fine X2 Neo does a reasonably good job of accurately previewing what a final photo will actually look like. For example, background blur is accurately shown when composing a portrait in the simulated shallow depth-of-field mode. However, the preview doesn’t capture the effect of the phone’s high dynamic range processing very well, so the preview image can show a lot more clipping than the final photo, as seen below. Preview, highlights clipped Capture, HDR capture more successful than preview showed The Oppo Find X2 Neo achieves a Zoom score of 61. Its dedicated wide camera module has a measured focal length of mm-equivalent, defining the widest field of view the phone can capture. At this widest setting, the phone does not distinguish itself, earning one of the lower wide scores under our new protocol. Exposure is usually accurate, but dynamic range is limited and detail levels are not great. Our testers also noticed cyan shift and color fringing. Ultra-wide, reduced detail, high noise Progressing through the zoom range to the longer end, we reach the Find X2 Neo’s tele-module, which provides a 2x optical zoom relative to the main camera. Exposure is accurate, but detail suffers and noise is high in the tele range, and predictably gets worse when narrowing the tele module’s native field of view through cropping. Reduced detail, high noise The Oppo earned itself a very decent Video score of 97. When shooting 4K video at 30 fps the settings used in testing, exposure is generally accurate, but as with stills, the Find X2 Neo underexposes in low light. Dynamic range is limited, so expect clipping in high-contrast scenes; scenes with wide dynamic range also push the phone to underexpose. Our testers also noticed exposure instabilities across all conditions. Detail is fairly high in bright light and in typical indoor light, but detail drops in low light, sometimes because of underexposure. Noise is well controlled except when light levels get low. Colors run slightly cool in outdoor shooting, and a yellow cast is visible in low light. Autofocus is reasonably fast, though testers noted some instabilities and occasional misfocusing, especially in low light. Stabilization is effective, so shots stay steady. Oppo Find X2 Neo, outdoor video Oppo Find X2 Neo, indoor video Pros Exposure accurate indoors and out Good detail For indoor still shots, vivid colors with pleasant skin tones Depth estimation accurate in bokeh mode Efficient video stabilization Fairly fast AF in video mode Cons AF is slow and unstable in stills mode Underexposure in low light Warm color cast in low light Visible noise under most conditions for stills, in low light for video Low detail and high noise when zoomed in In flash-off mode, night shots often underexposed Dynamic range of preview image less than final photo Dynamic range limited in all conditions for video mode AF sometimes misses in low light when shooting video Cold color cast outdoors in video mode Exposure instabilities when shooting video
CompareOppo Find X2 Neo with Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro: advantages and disadvantages of models. Oppo Find X2 Neo or Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro: which is better to choose. Toggle navigation GSM Versus. Home; Brands; Compare models; Model; Home. Comparison. Oppo. Oppo Find X2 Neo . Compare Oppo Find X2 Neo and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro. Oppo FindVoir toute la catĂ©gorie Pro PubliĂ© le 12/11/19 Ă 07h00 7 Avec son Mi Note 10, Xiaomi frappe un grand coup sur la table. Ce terminal propose une autonomie spectaculaire et pas moins de 5 modules photo sur sa carapace. De quoi faire trembler l'Oppo Reno2, pourtant très bon ? RĂ©ponse dans ce duel... Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Prix de lancement 550 € Note Les NumĂ©riques 4 230,00 Marketplace occasion 232,00 reBuy 257,99 Rakuten 275,60 Darty Marketplace 349,00 Amazon Marketplace 399,00 Amazon Marketplace occasion 517,78 Fonctionnement du tableau de prix Oppo Reno2 Note Les NumĂ©riques 1 Cdiscount Marketplace 237,00 Marketplace occasion 243,00 Fonctionnement du tableau de prix CaractĂ©ristiques Oppo Reno2 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Dimensions 160 x x mm x x mm Poids 189 g 206 g Diagonale d'Ă©cran pouces pouces DĂ©finition d'Ă©cran 2400 x 1080 px 2340 x 1080 px RĂ©solution 401 ppp 398 ppp Type d’écran Amoled Amoled Part de l’écran en surface % % Puce mobile Snapdragon 730G Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G Processeur Dual-Cluster, octa-core 2x Kryo 470 Gold GHz 6x Kryo 470 Silver GHz - GHz Kryo 470 - GHz Nombre de cĹ“urs 8 8 GPU intĂ©grĂ© iGPU Adreno 618 Adreno 618 MĂ©moire vive RAM 8 Go 6 Go MĂ©moire interne 256 Go 128 Go Carte mĂ©moire Oui Non CapacitĂ© de la batterie 4000 mAh 5260 mAh Capteur photo avant 16 Mpx 32 Mpx Captation vidĂ©o 4K 4K Système d'exploitation OS Android Android Version d'OS testĂ©e Pie Oreo Connectique USB-C USB-C Capteur d’empreintes digitales Oui Oui Type Wi-Fi Type Bluetooth Dual-sim Oui Oui Format carte SIM Nano Nano Type d'Ă©tanchĂ©itĂ© Non Batterie amovible Non Non NFC Oui 4G LTE Oui Gyroscope Oui Bandes de frĂ©quence 4G B1 2100, B20 800, B28 700, B3 1800, B7 2600 Charge par induction Non Antichoc Non Depuis l'arrivĂ©e des smartphones chinois en France, le marchĂ© a gagnĂ© en compĂ©titivitĂ©. Moteur de cette accĂ©lĂ©ration, Xiaomi et, dans une moindre mesure, Oppo, enchaĂ®nent des smartphones aux fiches techniques solides et aux tarifs attractifs. En cette fin d'annĂ©e 2019, les deux constructeurs ont mis les bouchĂ©es doubles avec des terminaux tout bonnement excellents. En octobre, Oppo lançait le Reno2, son terminal le plus abouti. En ce dĂ©but novembre, c'est au tour de Xiaomi de dĂ©gainer avec le Mi Note 10, un modèle Ă©quipĂ© d'un capteur photo Ă 108 Mpx, rien que ET DESIGN ÉGALITÉPour ce premier round, les deux terminaux se sĂ©parent sur une Ă©galitĂ©. Le Reno2 et le Mi Note 10 profitent tous deux d'une excellente finition. Il s'agit Ă©galement de smartphones imposants, avec des dalles de 6,5 pouces difficiles Ă manier d'une seule main. Le Mi Note 10, le plus classique des deux, propose une encoche en goutte d'eau. De son cĂ´tĂ©, le Oppo rĂ©itère son concept d'aileron escamotable logeant l'appareil photo Reno2 et Mi Note 10 de dosSi les deux terminaux sont capables d'accueillir deux nano-SIM, seul le Reno2 offre la possibilitĂ© de glisser une carte microSD. Un luxe puisque le Reno2 possède dĂ©jĂ 256 Go de mĂ©moire interne. Il faudra en revanche se contenter de 128 Go de mĂ©moire interne sur le Mi Note 10. Enfin, les deux terminaux ne possèdent aucune certification d'Ă©tanchĂ©itĂ©, une lacune encore très commune dans ces gammes de ÉGALITÉEncore une fois, il s'avère difficile de dĂ©clarer un vainqueur sur cette manche. Il faut dire les dalles Oled de nos concurrents du jour sont tout bonnement excellentes. Le Mi Note 10, avec sa diagonale de 6,46 pouces, sa tempĂ©rature des couleurs positionnĂ©e Ă 6 240 K et son delta E exemplaire 1,4 tutoie la perfection. De son cĂ´tĂ©, le Reno 2 rivalise dans l'excellence avec des valeurs très proches 6,5 pouces, 6 799 K, delta E moyen Ă 2,4. Finalement, les seules diffĂ©rences se verront sur des dĂ©tails. La dalle du Reno2 propose une meilleure luminositĂ© maximale 737 cd/m² contre 588 cd/m², le Mi Note 10 profite lui d'une meilleure luminositĂ© minimale 1,8 cd/m² contre 2,3 cd/m². Pas de quoi se distinguer donc. Deux Ă©crans de très bonne qualitĂ©PERFORMANCES ÉGALITÉPour ce round, le Reno2 et le Mi Note 10 font encore match nul pour une simple raison les deux smartphones disposent du mĂŞme Ă©quipement, ou presque. On retrouve donc une puce Snapdragon 730G sur les deux terminaux. Mais lĂ oĂą le Mi Note 10 se "contente" de 6 Go de RAM, le Reno2 en offre 8. Et cet apport permet au smartphone d'Oppo d'obtenir des rĂ©sultats lĂ©gèrement meilleurs, sans distancer son concurrent pour autant. On trouve donc un indice de performance global Ă 87,08 sur le Reno2 et Ă 80,85 sur le Mi Note 10. Encore une fois, la diffĂ©rence est si tĂ©nue qu'il est difficile de dĂ©signer un vainqueur. Les deux smartphones parviennent Ă accomplir l'essentiel du multitâche demandĂ© par l'utilisateur et permettent de jouer aux mĂŞmes jeux. PHOTO Mi NOTE 10Il fallait donc attendre la photo pour voir un de nos deux prĂ©tendants du jour remporter un round. Et c'est le Mi Note 10 qui se dĂ©tache. Avec son capteur de 108 Mpx, ses tĂ©lĂ©objectifs 2x et 5x, un ultragrand-angle et son module macro, le terminal parvient Ă obtenir cinq Ă©toiles en photo, lĂ oĂą le Reno2 stagne Ă quatre. Pourtant ce dernier offre une belle polyvalence avec un module grand-angle, un ultragrand-angle et un tĂ©lĂ©objectif. Mais le Mi Note 10 met donc la barre un peu plus modules et 108 Mpx pour le Mi Note 10 ; 3 modules et 48 Mpx pour le Reno2 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Oppo Reno2 Module principal 108 Mpx, f/ eq. 24 mm 48 Mpx, f/1,7, eq. 26 mm Module 2x 12 Mpx, f/ eq. 41 mm 13 Mpx, f/2,4, eq. 58 mm Module 5x 5 Mpx, f/ / Module ultragrand-angle 20 Mpx, f/ eq. 16 mm 8 Mpx, f/2,2, eq. 18 mm Module macro 2 Mpx, f/ / Module principalPour commencer, dès l’utilisation du module principal en mode standard 27 Mpx pour le Mi Note 10 et 12 Mpx pour le Reno2, le smartphone de Xiaomi prend une lĂ©gère avance. Ses clichĂ©s sont lĂ©gèrement plus rĂ©alistes, avec une accentuation moindre des contrastes. On trouve Ă©galement un piquĂ© un peu plus prononcĂ©. Oppo Reno2 12 Mpx Xiaomi Mi Note 10 27 Mpx De nuit, le Mi Note 10 lisse, comme nous en avons l’habitude avec Xiaomi, mais propose une scène lisible. C’est cette fois le Reno2 qui propose un clichĂ© davantage rĂ©aliste, malgrĂ© un bruit Ă©lectronique bien visible. Oppo Reno2 12 Mpx nuit Xiaomi Mi Note 10 27 Mpx nuit Une fois en 108 Mpx, le Mi Note 10 distance encore un peu plus le Reno2 et ses 48 Mpx, avec davantage de piquĂ©, un clichĂ© mieux exposĂ© et un rĂ©sultat largement plus convaincant. D'autant plus que le terminal de Xiaomi permet, grâce aux 108 Mpx, de recadrer sĂ©rieusement l'image. Oppo Reno2 48 Mpx jour Mi Note 10 108 Mpx jour Module ultragrand-angleConcernant l'ultragrand-angle, c'est tout d'abord une question de dĂ©finition qui sĂ©pare les deux smartphones. Avec 20 Mpx, le Mi Note 10 propose plus de piquĂ©. Le Reno2 ne fait pas beaucoup moins bien sur le reste, que ce soit l'exposition ou le traitement d'image. Oppo Reno2 UGA jour Xiaomi Mi Note 10 UGA jour De nuit, les deux modèles ont du mal Ă fournir des clichĂ©s convenables. Le Mi Note 10 se trouve noyĂ© sous le bruit Ă©lectronique tandis que le Reno2 lisse l'image Ă outrance. Oppo Reno2 UGA nuit Xiaomi Mi Note 10 UGA nuit Module tĂ©lĂ©objectif 2xEncore une fois, les deux terminaux rĂ©agissent de manière opposĂ©e ici. Le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 accentue comme jamais les contrastes tandis que l'Oppo Reno2 lisse Ă©normĂ©ment. On prĂ©fĂ©rera tout de mĂŞme le clichĂ© du smartphone frappĂ© d'un Mi, pour une image un peu plus rĂ©aliste. Oppo Reno2 2x jour Xiaomi Mi Note 10 2x jour Module tĂ©lĂ©objectif 5xEn 5x, le Mi Note 10 profite de son module dĂ©diĂ© tandis que le Reno2 s'aventure dans le zoom hybride. Sur cette nouvelle manche, c'est encore une fois le Mi Note 10 qui l'emporte, avec toujours davantage de dĂ©tails, et encore une fois un peu moins de lissage. Oppo Reno2 5x jour Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5x jour AUTONOMIE Mi NOTE 10Après la photo, le Mi Note 10 remporte une seconde manche dĂ©cisive, celle de l'autonomie. Avec son accumulateur de 5 260 mAh, il est parvenu Ă tenir pendant 22 h 49 min sous notre protocole de test d'autonomie. De quoi mettre 5 heures au Reno2, qui n'a rĂ©sistĂ© que 17 h 41 min. Il est quand mĂŞme important de noter que le smartphone d'Oppo rĂ©alise une performance cinq Ă©toiles, mais se voit terrassĂ© par l'un des meilleurs dans ce charge, le Reno2 se montre un peu plus rapide 1 h 24 min pour remonter Ă 100 % contre un peu plus de 2 h pour le Mi Note 10.VERDICT Mi NOTE 10Le Reno2 se bat comme un beau diable, mais le Mi Note 10 se rĂ©vèle beaucoup trop compĂ©titif pour lui laisser la plus haute marche. Ainsi, le terminal de Xiaomi s'avère injouable sur des rounds très importants comme la photo et l'autonomie. D'autant plus qu'il ne lâche rien dans le reste. Nous vous conseillons donc de vous tourner vers le Mi Note 10, un smartphone qui devrait devenir rapidement un mètre Ă©talon dans sa gamme. Une fois de plus, Xiaomi redĂ©finit le rapport qualitĂ©/prix. Publications qui peuvent vous intĂ©resser Comparai cellulari Redmi Note 11S, Asus Zenfone 7, Samsung Galaxy M31s, OnePlus Nord, Oppo Find X2 Neo, Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S10, Samsung Galaxy S9, Samsung Galaxy Note 8, Samsung Galaxy Note 7, Samsung Galaxy Note 5, Samsung Galaxy Note 4 e scopri tutte le differenze. Comparativa Oppo Find X2 Neo vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Oppo Find X2 Neo RAM icon Created with Sketch. 12gb 256gb 48 Mpx, Ć’/ Android 2020-04-22 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Antutu icon Created with Sketch. Bateria icon Created with Sketch. 4025 mAh 171 g Xiaomi Mi Note 10 RAM icon Created with Sketch. 6gb 128gb 108 Mpx, Ć’/ Android 9 Pie 2019-11-04 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Antutu icon Created with Sketch. 264898 Bateria icon Created with Sketch. 5260 mAh 208 g Screen Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Screen Tipo AMOLED AMOLED Diagonal ResoluciĂłn 1080 x 2400 px 1080 x 2340 px Densidad pĂxeles 398 ppi Extras Resistente a rayones Bordes redondeados Resistente a rayones Oppo Find X2 Neo Camera Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Camera General ResoluciĂłn 48 Mpx 108 Mpx NĂşmero de cámaras traseras 4 4 Apertura Ć’/ Ć’/ Tamaño de pixel Sensor Sony IMX586 Exmor RS Samsung Bright S5KHMX Dxomark foto 130 Dxomark video 102 Extras Estabilizador raw HDR Video 4K Zoom digital Video 4K Estabilizador Zoom digital HDR raw Selfies NĂşmero de cámaras frontales 1 1 ResoluciĂłn 32 Mpx 32 Mpx Apertura Ć’/ Ć’/ Sensor Samsung S5KGD1 Samsung S5KGD1 Oppo Find X2 Neo Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Sistema operativo Android Android 9 Pie GPU Qualcomm Adreno 620 Qualcomm Adreno 618 Procesador Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G MĂłviles con procesador Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G MĂłviles con procesador Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Frecuencia GHz GHz Capa fabricante Color OS 7 MIUI 11 Sensores Sensor de Proximidad Giroscopio AcelerĂłmetro Lector de huella dactilar Sensor de Proximidad Luz Ambiente Giroscopio AcelerĂłmetro Lector de huella dactilar Oppo Find X2 Neo Autonomy Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Autonomy Tipo de baterĂa LiPo LiPo Capacidad baterĂa 4025 mAh 5260 mAh Carga rápida true true Oppo Find X2 Neo Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Conectividad Radio FM USB Type C NFC Dual SIM Bluetooth Audio jack 5G MĂłviles con 5G4G 3G 2G Radio FM Audio jack NFC USB Type C Bluetooth Nano SIM Dual SIM 4G 3G 2G Oppo Find X2 Neo Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Almacenamiento interno 256gb 128gb RAM 12gb 6gb Oppo Find X2 Neo Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Antutu 264898 VersiĂłn Antutu v8 Stabilization The Oppo Find X3 Neo is the middle entry in the company’s X series, slotted between the top-end X3 Pro and the X3 Lite. It features a 6.55-inch, 90-Hz FHD+ AMOLED display, Qualcomm’s 865 chipset with 5G support, and 12 GB of memory along with 256 GB of storage. There are four cameras on the back. Please note In October 2020, we updated the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. Version 4 now includes image preview tests and a wide range of new test scenes as part of our new trustability evaluation which measures the camera’s ability to deliver consistent still image and video quality across all shooting scenarios. We have retested this device using the new version 4 of the test protocol and produced this completely updated review. For more information, please see our article about preview, trustability and other version 4 updates of the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. Powered by Qualcomm’s top-end Snapdragon 865 chipset, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra is the Chinese manufacturer’s latest flagship device and was launched on the occasion of the company’s 10-year anniversary. Like its sister device the Mi 10 Pro that was released earlier this year, the Mi 10 Ultra comes with a quad-camera setup that includes dual-tele cameras and an ultra-wide module. However, there are some important differences in the camera The Ultra’s main camera uses a 48MP Quad-Bayer sensor instead of the 108MP version in the Pro. The long tele-lens is stabilized and now comes with a staggering 120mm equivalent focal length versus 94mm on the Pro, and at 1/2-inch versus 1/ the image sensor is considerably larger on the Ultra. Xiaomi has also made improvements to the ultra-wide camera. It offers an optical focal length of 12mm, and even after distortion correction has been applied, we still measured the widest field of view of all ultra-wide cameras we have seen to date. Can the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra retain the top spot in the DXOMARK Camera ranking under version 4 of our test protocol? Read on to find out. Taking pictures with the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Key camera specifications Primary 48MP 1/ Quad-Bayer sensor, 25mm-equivalent lens with f/ aperture, PDAF and OIS Telephoto 1 12MP 1/ sensor, 50mm-equivalent 2x optical lens with f/2 aperture, Dual-Pixel AF Telephoto 2 48MP 1/2-inch Quad Bayer sensor, 120mm-equivalent 5x optical lens with f/ aperture, PDAF and OIS Ultra-wide 20MP 1/ sensor, 12mm-equivalent lens with f/ aperture, PDAF Dual-LED flash Multispectral color temperature sensor Video 8K 4320p at 24fps, 4K 2160p at 30/60fps 2160p/60fps tested Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 chipset About DXOMARK Camera tests For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here. Test summary Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 133 camera 92 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 92 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 98 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 104 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 90 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 65 Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 72 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 75 Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 58 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 133 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 53 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 90 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 94 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 87 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 93 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 95 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 84 Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 101 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 With an overall DXOMARK Camera score of 133, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra secures the top spot among all devices tested under the new version 4 of our test protocol. Its Photo score of 136 is also among the very best. The exceptional Photo score is based on an excellent still image performance across all test areas. The camera gets all the basics right most of the time such as target exposure, color rendering, and white balance, and offers a very wide dynamic range, capturing good detail in both bright and dark areas of the scene. This makes it ideal for shooting in challenging high-contrast conditions. When shooting in bokeh mode, the Xiaomi uses its 2x tele lens, achieving very natural-looking results. Night and low-light photographers will be satisfied with the Mi 10 Ultra, too. Xiaomi has managed a good trade-off between texture and noise in images captured in dim conditions, and the camera is capable of achieving good exposures even in extremely low light. Portrait shots recorded in bokeh mode show the usual slight isolation imperfections around foreground subjects, but the blur effects look quite natural, and bokeh images are overall on a level similar to those from other top-end phones. Quality of the preview image is good, too, with few target exposure, noise and texture differences compared to the final capture. The main camera offers excellent exposure and dynamic range as well as pleasant colors with accurate white balance. The Xiaomi’s ultra-wide camera offers the widest field of view we have seen. With an outstanding Zoom score of 101 the Xiaomi is also a perfect choice for photographers who like as much flexibility as possible in terms of focal range. The Xiaomi’s ultra-wide camera offers the widest field of view we have seen, and at the long end, a 120mm-equivalent tele-lens provides more reach than most competitors. In addition, image quality leaves little to complain about across the entire zoom range, with only some loss of texture and slightly increased noise levels at the widest and longest zoom settings. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra also moves into the number one position for Video, thanks to an outstanding video score of 110. It’s the first device we have tested that achieves the overall best results at 4K resolution and a frame rate of 60fps. The fast frame rate ensures smooth motion and panning in all situations. Usually using 60fps or even faster frame rates means having to make compromises in other areas, but the Xiaomi is capable of delivering good exposure, nice color, and good detail, even when recording in low light, thanks to its adaptive frame rate control which slows things down to 33fps in dim and/or difficult conditions. The autofocus is fast and consistent, too, and the stabilization system counteracts photographer motion very effectively. Dynamic range could be wider and some highlight clipping can be seen in high-contrast video clips, but overall the Mi 10 Ultra records the best smartphone videos we have seen to date. &65279;&65279;&65279; Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor video Photo scores explained The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra achieves our second highest Photo score to date at 136 points. In this section, we take a closer look at how each sub-score was determined and compare image quality against key it’s key competitors, the Huawei P40 Pro and Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max. Exposure and Contrast Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 The Mi 10 Ultra achieves a good score for exposure, thanks to very good target exposure and dynamic range capabilities in all conditions. In our new contrast entropy lab measurements for dynamic range, some exposure failures were recorded in very strong HDR scenes. As you can see in the chart below with a difference of 7EV between the shadows and highlights the Mi 10 Ultra is noticeably worse than its Huawei and Apple competitors, with its entropy score dropping well below our 6-bit target level. It’s much better in lower contrast 2EV and 4EV conditions, but not as consistent as the P40 Pro, which excelled in this test with entropy consistently above 6-bit. Contrast entropy measurements from 20 to 1000lux / 2 to 7EV This analysis bore out in our perceptual analysis of natural scenes. Where the difference in brightness between the shadows and highlights is low, as in the scene below, the Mi 10 Ultra does an exceptional job with good overall exposure and wide dynamic range. In higher contrast HDR scenes however, some tone compression can be visible and the device often fails to maintain detail in all areas. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, good exposure with wide dynamic range Huawei P40 Pro, good exposure with wide dynamic range Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, bright target exposure with some highlight clipping The same applies on indoor HDR exposures. Whilst overall the results are acceptable and generally highlights are well preserved in backlit scenes, the Mi 10 Pro tends to over-lighten the shadows and introducing tone compression and poor contrast, which can look a little disappointing in the final image. Exposures are very good in low light however, where good target exposures ensure well-lit portraits, like in our candle dinner scene. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, good target exposure with some highlight clipping Huawei P40 Pro, excellent target exposure and wide dynamic range Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, under exposed subject and some highlight clipping Color Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 The Xiaomi also does well for color. Color rendering tends to be very pleasant, with nice blue skies and lush greens in well-balanced outdoor scenes. The exposure problems we identified in strong HDR and backlit scenes slip over into our color analysis as well though, with flat and uninspiring color often evident in both shadows and skies. Indoors color remains very good with nice levels of saturation and fairly neutral white balance under a range of artificial light sources. In very low light, stronger white balance casts can become more prevalent, and in very dark and difficult scenes color rendering is not perfect, but overall the Mi 10 Ultra does a good job for color. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, good color rendering and neutral white balance Huawei P40 Pro, good color rendering with a slight magenta cast Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, slightly lower saturation and a warmish yellow cast Autofocus Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 The Mi 10 Ultra autofocus system was an excellent performer in our benchmark lab testing, delivering fast, accurate and repeatable results in almost all lighting conditions. The only exception was very low light 5 lux, where the device is a little inconsistent. Whilst it could be fast, the Mi 10 Ultra often took around a second to lock sharp in these low light conditions, although to be fair all shots were in sharp focus. The Xiaomi device also put in a strong showing in our new lab HDR test scene. where the device consistently found sharp focus in super quick time with contrast set at 7EV. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, autofocus comparison on HDR scene with 7EV variation In our perceptual analysis autofocus behavior was very reliable too, with no seriously out of focus shots observed by our testers. The only issue is slightly limited depth-of-field and when capturing a group shot the Mi 10 ultra has a tendency to miss focus on the first face and often locks on to a portrait towards the background. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, autofocus Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, front portrait not focused Huawei P40 Pro, autofocus Huawei P40 Pro, crop, front portrait focused Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, autofocus Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, front portrait focused Texture Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 Noise Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra delivers a good trade-off between detail and noise, and is among the best in this category. The device performed well in our lab texture measurements, with a texture score over 80 in bright light 1000 lux dropping to a very respectable 70 in low light 5 lux, showing it’s capable of capturing very high detail in all conditions. It’s close, but slightly behind the P40 Pro, which is able to squeeze out a little more detail in all lighting conditions and especially in near-dark 1 lux tests. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ulta, DMC texture comparison by lighting condition versus competitors In natural test scenes the Mi10 Ultra also proved itself capable of resolving high levels of detail, with fine structures particularly well preserved in outdoor images, where it matches results from the P40 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max. The Xiaomi device earns its stripes indoors too, where detail is fractionally better overall compared to the Huawei and iPhone. All three devices perform incredibly well though for texture on this handheld indoors shot, with the Xiaomi and Huawei shots recording slightly cleaner files with less visible noise compared to the iPhone. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor texture Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent detail Huawei P40 Pro, indoor texture Huawei P40 Pro, crop, excellent detail Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor texture Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, excellent detail The Xiaomi also handles image noise very well managed, with noise levels close to the best cameras in this category. In outdoor shots a fine luminance noise is slightly visible in areas of uniform color and recovered shadow areas on HDR images, but nothing too problematic. In low light, the Mi 10 Ultra’s texture/noise managements falls somewhere between the Huawei and Apple devices. In this indoor shot, fine detail in the face is broadly comparable between the Xiaomi and Huawei, but the P40 Pro delivers a cleaner file with less noise. The Mi 10 Ultra manages to surpass the iPhone in both respects however. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, low light Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, good detail with slight noise Huawei P40 Pro, low light Huawei P40 Pro, crop, good detail with low noise Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, low light Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, lower detail and more noise Artifacts Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 Image artifacts are generally well managed on the Mi 10 Ultra camera. Our testers found some fusion artifacts and color quantization, as well as flare, moirĂ©, and some color fringing, but you would have to look very closely to spot any of these effects. It’s also worth mentioning that the Xiaomi maintains good sharpness into the corners of the image, which is where many other devices, even high-end models, suffer from a loss of acutance. If you look closely in the corners of this shot, you can see an unnatural rendering of texture that is likely caused by the Xiaomi camera’s fusion algorithms. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, artifacts Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, unnatural texture rendering Maze artifacts are visible in the fine textures on the facade of the building in the background. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, artifacts Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, maze artifact Bokeh Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 The Mi 10 Ultra is more than capable of producing a good-looking simulated bokeh shot and is among the very best devices we have tested in this category. The camera uses the short tele-lens with its 50mm focal length in bokeh mode, which gives it an advantage in terms of field of view over devices that record images with a wide-angle camera in portrait mode. Depth estimation is also generally accurate, with only fairly minor depth artifacts visible around challenging elements of the scene. Bokeh mode also gets all the basics right, such as exposure and color, and sharpness is good. Bright spotlights in the background are round with good contrast, as they should be, but the blur gradient from front to back can occasionally look a little unnatural, with fairly abrupt changes in blur intensity. In this sample below, the Xiaomi does an excellent job at isolating the subject’s fine hair from the background. The Huawei is good as well, but the Samsung struggles somewhat. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor bokeh Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent subject isolation Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, indoor bokeh Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, some depth estimation artifacts Huawei P40 Pro, indoor bokeh Huawei P40 Pro, crop, excellent subject isolation In this long-range comparison, the Xiaomi produces stronger background blur than the other devices, which makes for a very pleasant effect overall. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor bokeh, strong background blur Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, outdoor bokeh, less background blur Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor bokeh, slightly less background blur Night Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra is also our new top performer for night and low-light photography, thanks to excellent image quality in all types of low-light scenes. With the flash set to auto mode, the camera behaves as it should, triggering the flash for portrait shots, but not for landscape or cityscape images. Further, the Xiaomi does an excellent job with indoor portrait shots. The flash output is nicely balanced with the ambient light, making for a nice exposure and overall natural feel of the image. The Samsung does not trigger the flash for this scene, which results in a target exposure on the subject that is lower than on the Mi 10 Ultra, and there is also some highlight clipping in the background. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, flash-auto Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent balance between flash and ambient light Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, flash-auto Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, slightly dark face and highlight clipping In night landscapes and cityscapes, target exposure is usually good and the auto white balance system works accurately. In the sample below, you can see that the Xiaomi produces a slightly brighter exposure than the Oppo Find 2X pro and especially the P40 Pro, which makes for an overall more pleasant look in many night shots. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, flash-auto, excellent exposure Oppo Find X2 Pro, slightly darker exposure Huawei P40 Pro, flash-auto, slightly dark exposure Flash-off mode produces good results, too, with good exposure and decent detail. The portrait shot below has pleasant skin tones with good facial exposure and well-controlled noise. The P40 Pro produces an overall brighter exposure for this shot, but this results in slightly washed-out skin tones, highlight clipping in the background, and a strong loss of detail. The Oppo captured a strongly underexposed image. The Xiaomi deals by far the best with this difficult low-light situation. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, flash-off Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent target exposure, low noise Oppo Find X2 Pro, flash-off Oppo Find X2 Pro, crop, strong underexposure Huawei P40 Pro, flash-off Huawei P40 Pro, crop, good exposure, lack of detail Preview Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 Analyzing the quality and accuracy of the Mi 10 Ultra’s preview image, the overall quality is good, with few target exposure, noise and texture inconsistencies with the final capture. The absence of live HDR processing means it’s less successful in high contrast conditions however, where highlights are over-exposed and shadows or faces often slightly under exposed. Preview, in high contrast or backlit conditions there is no HDR processing for accurate color and exposure in preview. Capture, noise and texture are similar to preview in the final image. It’s a similar story for bokeh rendering, where the Mi 10 Ultra does a pretty good job although there are some slight differences. In reasonably well balanced lighting, exposure and color are fairly accurate and again noise and texture rendering is good. Bokeh activation is also reliable, giving users reassurance the effect will be applied in capture. Depth estimation isn’t perfect however, with artifacts often visible around the subject, and the depth-of-field effect differs slightly, with greater blur intensity and better blur gradient in the final render, but those niggles aside it does an ok job. Preview, bokeh simulation is usually activated in Portrait mode with slight edge artifacts often visible. Capture, the final render is fairly close but with better depth estimation and blur gradient and a stronger blur intensity. For zoom smoothness, preview remains stable whilst pinching ensuring smooth field-of-view transitions as the device switches between its ultra-wide, standard-wide and tele-lens modules. Some minor instabilities are evident in exposure adaptation and focus, but nothing too problematic. Bigger oscillations are evident using the dedicated magnification buttons for zoom, and particularly when switching between the standard-wide and tele-lens as you can see in this example. &65279; Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, zoom preview Zoom scores explained The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra achieves an outstanding Zoom score of 101 points, by far the best in our current database. The Zoom score is calculated from the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were achieved and compare zoom image quality against some key competitors. Tele Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 The Mi 10 Ultra follows in the tradition of previous Xiaomi flagships like the Mi 10 Pro with a strong performance in our new tele-lens analysis. Image quality in general is outstanding and detail is very good across the zoom range. Compared to the output of most of the competition however, zoom images are impressive with lots of detail, especially at close, long, and very long zoom distances. At medium zoom factors around 4x the Xiaomi images boasts very good detail towards the center of the frame, but there is a noticeable fall-off in sharpness towards the edges which is caused by image fusion. Some strong luminance noise is also visible in some images and our testers also observed an occasional loss of texture on small surfaces, but those minor quibbles aside the tele-lens is a key strength on the Mi 10 Ultra. The shots below were captured at 50mm, a zoom factor of approximately 2x. On the face towards the centre of the frame detail is good, but resolution is fractionally behind the Samsung S20 Ultra in this example and the Mi 10 Pro is noticeably sharper. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, very good detail Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, crop, excellent detail Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, 50mm Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, very good detail At 160mm, a zoom factor of approximately 5x, the Mi 10 Ultra surpasses the S20 Ultra for resolution however and offers a brighter exposure with more neutral white balance. The Mi 10 Pro still edges it for sharpness though, with improved rendering of fine structures compared to the Mi 10 Ultra. For the Xiaomi devices these are really quite impressive results given the zoom magnifications and lighting conditions though, which is why they’re at the top of our rankings for zoom capabilities. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, 160mm Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, good detail Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, crop, excellent detail Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, 160mm Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, lower detail Wide Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 The ultra-wide camera is a highlight of the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra’s camera performance. On paper it offers a very wide 12mm focal length but the camera applies some distortion correction which very slightly reduces the field-of-view. However at a measured it still offers the widest field-of-view of all smartphone cameras to date, making it a great option for fans of ultra-wide-angle photography. In terms of image quality, the ultra-wide gets all the basics right, too, delivering very good target exposure and a wide dynamic range as well as pleasant color. Detail could be better, but the Xiaomi has that in common with most ultra-wide cameras we have tested. Some noise is visible, too. Images show some distortion, but the effect is fairly well under control. Thanks to a fairly light distortion correction, the loss of sharpness towards the edges of the frame that we see on many ultra-wides is not too strong on the Xiaomi. Our testers also observed some chromatic aberrations and ringing under indoor lighting, but image artifacts are otherwise pretty well controlled on the Mi 10 Ultra’s ultra-wide camera. In the scene below you can see that the Xiaomi squeezes a lot more scene into the frame than the Huawei and other phones on the market. On the other hand, the Huawei’s ultra-wide camera is hard to beat in terms of texture/noise and dynamic range. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, very wide field of view Huawei P40 Pro, narrower field of view The Xiaomi is also slightly wider than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and produces images with slightly better detail and less noise. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, ultra-wide Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, good detail, low noise Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, ultra-wide Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, slight loss of detail, oversharpening Video scores explained A device’s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of attributes in the same way as the Photo score. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra is among the best for Video at 110 points. The video sub-scores are as follows Exposure 90, Color 94, Autofocus 87, Texture 93, Noise 95, Artifacts 84, and Stabilization 101. In this section, we take a closer look at the device’s strengths and weakness for video, with some comparisons against key competitors. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra delivered its best results in video mode when set to 2160p resolution and a frame rate of 60fps. Overall, the device performs very well at these settings, achieving our highest Video score to date at 106. Video target exposure is a nice strength. As you can see in our lab analysis chart below, the Mi 10 Ultra is capable of bright video in virtually all lighting conditions, with great exposure of 50L* measured in low light 5 lux. Video target exposure comparison Exposure adaptation in changing light levels is good but not perfect, and slightly limited dynamic range often leads to highlight clipping in very bright scenes. Examining stills from this bright scene, you can see the iPhone 11 Pro Max controls the highlights better and is able to capture more detail in the white boats. On the downside, a fairly strong reddish cast is visible in this sample video still. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, still from video, slightly limited dynamic range often results in highlight clipping in bright scenes. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, still from video, better control of the highlights ensures a better exposure on the boats. Color, on the other hand, does not leave any reason to complain. Color rendering is pleasant in all situations and white balance is accurate, usually avoiding nasty color casts of any kind. Texture in 4K capture mode is also a key strength, with excellent detail recorded in outdoor and indoor videos, with very respectable results in low light, too. Our lab measurements identify the Mi 10 Ultra offers a slight improvement over the P40 Pro which is also very good, and a significant improvement over the iPhone 11 Pro Max under indoor conditions 100 lux and especially low light conditions 5 lux, where the Xiaomi achieves around 85% acutance compared to around 55% on the Apple device. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, video texture acutance comparison Detail is obviously only good when videos are in sharp focus however and we did observe some autofocus instabilities on the Mi 10 Ultra. Focusing errors are fairly common on indoor and low light videos, but even in bright light problems persist with the Xiaomi often failing to lock on to portraits. This is visible in this portrait video where the comparison devices do a better job at focusing on the subject. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor video Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor video The video camera is capable of a very good compromise for texture and noise, especially considering the high level of detail visible in in-focus videos. In our measurements we recorded levels of spatial noise slightly below the P40 Pro in virtually all lighting conditions, and noticeably cleaner movies compared to the iPhone in low light. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, video spatial noise comparison Noise is certainly visible in low light videos, but given the noticeably higher level of detail captured compared to the P40 Pro in this example, it might be a sacrifice you’re willing to live with. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor video Huawei P40 Pro, indoor video Stabilization is very effective, too, reducing camera shake and walking motion significantly. The 60fps also means panning is buttery-smooth and the judder effect that is often noticeable at lower frame rates is reduced to a minimum. This is visible in this comparison. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor video Huawei P40 Pro, indoor video Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor video Conclusion Under version 4 of our DXOMARK Camera test protocol the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra remains the number one in our ranking and deservedly so. In Photo mode it doesn’t show any real weaknesses and delivers class-leading results in several categories. It’s particularly impressive in the wide and zoom sections, making it an ideal choice for those who want a zoom range as big as possible without compromising on image quality. It’s also a great tool for mobile videographers, offering excellent overall video quality with efficient stabilization at 4K and a fast 60fps frame rate that makes for super-smooth panning and motion. Overall, if it fits within your budget, the new Xiaomi flagship phone is an easy recommendation for mobile content creators. Pros Accurate target exposure Photo & Video Wide dynamic range Photo Vivid and pleasant color Photo & Video Excellent Autofocus in Photo Good texture/noise trade-off Photo & Video Nice night exposure Photo Pleasant Bokeh shots Photo Good zoom capabilities Photo Impressive ultra-wide field-of-view Photo Effective video stabilization Video Smooth 60fps capture Video Cons Noise visible in low light Photo & Video Limited live HDR in preview Photo Tone compression in HDR Photo Limited dynamic range Video Autofocus instabilities Video Please also have a look at our Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra gallery below. It includes images that have been shot in a variety of situations and shooting modes for you to view and examine. iShutter Speed 1/36 sec ISO 55 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed 1/33 sec ISO 219 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed 1/7 sec ISO 1198 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed 1/13 sec ISO 3049 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 25 mm i iShutter Speed 1/194 sec ISO 50 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 25 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i Bokeh mode iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i Bokeh mode iShutter Speed 1/36 sec ISO 174 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed 1/13 sec ISO 2407 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 25 mm i iShutter Speed 1/284 sec ISO 50 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i 634Rz. 17 14 389 487 389 80 115 331 326
xiaomi mi note 10 vs oppo find x2 neo
